On October 1 my six-year-old son and I began our own version of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet/GAPS Diet/Paleo eating plan. We made the decision to do it for a few reasons. First, I have Crohn's Disease and over the course of the last five years have been able to wean myself down to the minimum dosage of my maintenance medication, but have never felt completely comfortable with quitting it cold-turkey because I've been either pregnant or nursing at the time. I'm currently nursing a ten-month-old, but feel like it's a good time to try to go off the medication before another potential pregnancy.
The reason we decided to have my son do it is because he is allergic to peanuts and dairy. He turned six years old last August and while he has outgrown many other food allergies over the last few years (eggs, soy, pineapple, and tomato), these two allergies have actually gotten worse according to test results. My son nursed as a baby and never had a reaction to what I ate and was in my milk. He even received pumped milk up to the age of nearly three without reactions to what was in the milk, but when I tried to give him some of my pumped milk for an added probiotic boost last year he reacted to it. Even after avoiding dairy and peanuts for several weeks and trying again, he still had a reaction. Because of this and the fact that very few children outgrow their allergies if they haven't already by Kindergarten age, we knew that it was going to take something drastic, combined with a lot of prayer, to heal his body. Others have had luck with food allergies on the GAPS diet, so we thought we would give it a shot. At this point we have nothing to lose.
I'd had Breaking the Vicious Cycle, the book about the SCD diet, sitting on my bookshelf for years and had been ignoring it despite having people in my life tell me I should try it. It wasn't until a friend told me about her experience with her autistic son and the GAPS diet and then hearing about another woman at a Weston A. Price meeting who had "cured" her Crohn's Disease with the same diet, that I decided I needed to look into it.
The SCD, GAPS and Paleo diets are all very similar. You avoid all grains (not just gluten), including things like rice, oats, quinoa, potatoes, and other foods that people with gluten intolerances can eat. No sugar, preservatives, or other food additives are allowed. Basically, you can eat pastured meats, pastured eggs, raw dairy, organic fruits/vegetables, properly soaked nuts (and nut flours and butters), lentils, split peas, navy beans, honey, oils (we only eat coconut and olive), and a few other things. All of the diets vary a little in what they will and won't allow, but the point is the same - no grains and sugar, a therapeutic probiotic regimen, and clean eating so that your "leaky gut" can heal.
Preparing for the Diet
We spent the month of September preparing for the diet. Since we are already dealing with food allergies, intolerances, and special diets in our home, going on such an intense diet wasn't nearly as scary as it would be for most people. We haven't been able to eat at restaurants or eat processed foods for years now, so we didn't have to worry about adjusting our lifestyles to eat this way. We also already had sources for many of the foods on the plan, like pastured eggs/meat and raw dairy. We have basically been eating this way for years without completely cutting out sugar and grains, so that was going to be the hard part for us. For others who have to completely change the way they look at food, this process would seem much more overwhelming and difficult.
I also think that this diet would be very difficult for the average child. Most of the foods that children enjoy (and that are convenient for parents to feed them), such as breaded chicken nuggets, breads, cookies, crackers, french fries, candy, macaroni and cheese, etc. are not allowed on the diet. We didn't have to deal with a child that was being forced to give up the foods he liked, because our son has never been able to enjoy many of those foods due to his food allergies. He is used to not being allowed to eat what other people around him are enjoying.
There were some foods that were hard for my son to give up, mainly some of his favorite sugary treats. For me it was sourdough bread, bacon, and homemade pancakes with maple syrup. Eventually, we both weaned off of our grain and sugar addictions and I learned how to cook "legal" options that would replace them using nut flours and honey. We used the month of September to wean ourselves off of those foods and for me to refine my skills in cooking with our new staples.
Starting the Diet
On October 1, 2013 we officially began. We followed the GAPS protocol and for the first week we ate nothing but homemade bone broth to allow our digestive systems to heal. On top of this, my son started a new therapeutic dose of probiotics (I was already on a therapeutic dose). He went from taking 12 strains at 3 billion to 12 strains at 10 billion and I continued at 12 strains at 20 billion.
The first week was terrible. We both experienced very severe-die off reactions as our bodies purged the bad bacteria. By the second night we were both waking through the night and vomiting. This lasted about five days before we finally felt better.
I experienced a slight dip in my milk supply during the first few days, so I began eating homemade raw milk yogurt by day three. Since my son cannot have dairy, he was simply on the bone broths. Our next food we introduced was cooked vegetables in the broth and homemade sauerkraut, followed by egg yolks and cooked meats. By week three we were eating nut flours made from nuts that I had properly soaked and dehydrated, along with cooked fruits. The very last things we added were raw fruit and soaked lentils, split peas, and navy beans after the end of the first month.
Six weeks into the diet we were both feeling great and decided to up our probiotic dosage again. My son began taking 12 strains at 13 billion and I upped it to 12 strains at 23 billion. We did not experience a severe die-off the second time.
At the two month mark I hadn't taken my maintenance medication for my Crohn's Disease and was experiencing zero symptoms. In fact, my body was having the opposite reaction and I became very constipated and was only having a bowel movement once a week. Three months out and I'm still having problems with this issue. For years with my Crohn's Disease I have had to avoid trigger foods that would cause symptoms to flare, such as raw peppers, lentils, onions, or broccoli to name a few. I have learned that cutting out the fiber from all grains and then still avoiding those trigger foods makes digestion very difficult. I've had to change the way I eat and allow myself to consume small amounts of the trigger foods in order to stay "regular". It has been wonderful to enjoy a bowl of split pea soup or some raw peppers after avoiding them for nearly a decade.
The Results at Three Months
After three months I feel amazing. My nursing baby still wakes three times a night to eat and with previous babies I was feeling very run-down and could feel my immune system crashing and the Crohn's symptoms beginning to flare by this point. I feel like the diet has given me a tremendous amount of energy and I feel so healthy that the sleep-deprivation isn't as much of an issue. I imagine that I would feel like a million dollars if I were also getting solid sleep on top of this diet.
The effects of the diet on my son have also been amazing. After that first week of die-off he began having formed stools for the very first time in his life. His digestion is now very regular and solid. Another amazing result has been his weight gain. You would think that by cutting out nearly half of the foods he can eat, he would lose a lot of weight (which has been the case for me simply because I'm eating and craving less - I've lost all of my baby weight and then some, a total of 20 pounds in three months), however, he has had the opposite reaction. My son has always been extremely tiny, under the tenth percentile on the growth chart for weight most of the time. At age six he weighed 38 pounds, which was the same weight he had been for over a year. He lost two pounds during the first six weeks of the diet, but right before Christmas he was weighed again and had gained that two back plus another three pounds. Cutting out half of his diet and eating much more nutrient-dense food has resulted in a five pound weight gain after over a year and a half of no growth. This proves to me that his body is now absorbing more of the food he is eating and his digestion is getting more efficient. Since the goal of the diet is to heal the gaps in the intestinal wall, I have faith that this is a sign that something is happening there!
I plan to write more here about our journey, which will last at least two years, and also share some of our favorite recipes and tips for surviving this diet. If you or a family member are suffering from an autoimmune disease, food allergy/intolerance, or other ailment in which traditional medicine is failing you or giving you few options for full healing, this is something that may be an option for you. I won't lie, this diet is extreme and you have to follow it fanatically in order to see any benefit, but there are countless testimonies from people who have done it and have had great outcomes.
-Jessica
Showing posts with label breastfeeding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label breastfeeding. Show all posts
Saturday, January 4, 2014
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
I Love Bacteria
As someone living with Crohn's Disease, I am obsessed with bacteria (good and bad) and the role it plays in overall health. While professionals in the world of alternative medicine have been screaming about this topic for decades, it seems that Western medicine is finally catching on.
An amazing article on the topic came out last month in The New York Times. Written by Michael Pollan (author of some amazing books on food), the article titled "Some of My Best Friends Are Germs" talks about everything I've been trying to tell people ever since my diagnosis in 2006. If you haven't read it yet, grab a glass of kombucha and settle in, because it's long, but extremely informative.
Basically, what Michael Pollan is trying to say is that our Western diets and medical model are horrible for the good bacteria in our body. Antibiotic use, antibacterial obsessions, and processed foods DO have a negative impact on our bodies beyond antibiotic resistance and obesity.
So, start eating those fermented prebiotic foods, stop worrying about cleaning your house, breastfeed those babies as long as you can, make sure you aren't accidentally eating antibiotics in your meat and dairy, and embrace the bacteria around you. Life is dirty and sometimes that dirt is beautiful!
An amazing article on the topic came out last month in The New York Times. Written by Michael Pollan (author of some amazing books on food), the article titled "Some of My Best Friends Are Germs" talks about everything I've been trying to tell people ever since my diagnosis in 2006. If you haven't read it yet, grab a glass of kombucha and settle in, because it's long, but extremely informative.
Basically, what Michael Pollan is trying to say is that our Western diets and medical model are horrible for the good bacteria in our body. Antibiotic use, antibacterial obsessions, and processed foods DO have a negative impact on our bodies beyond antibiotic resistance and obesity.
So, start eating those fermented prebiotic foods, stop worrying about cleaning your house, breastfeed those babies as long as you can, make sure you aren't accidentally eating antibiotics in your meat and dairy, and embrace the bacteria around you. Life is dirty and sometimes that dirt is beautiful!
Labels:
antibiotics,
breastfeeding,
fermentation,
intestinal health,
LOTW,
probiotics
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Extended Breastfeeding Rant
I wrote this rant for my personal blog, but thought I would share it here too. It seems appropriate for a blog about health, because I feel that breastfeeding is one of the most important decisions you can make for your baby's physical and emotional health.
I finally got around to reading the TIME attachment parenting (AP) article today. I knew better, but did it anyways. I've been hearing nothing but negativity about the cover and parenting philosophy for over a week now, so I should have known that the article would portray these mothers negatively.
At first glance I disliked the picture. Not because I thought it was "pornographic" or "disgusting", as I've heard it described to me, but I thought it was the wrong choice for an article about this type of parenting philosophy (one that is about nurture and comfort). I've met some very militant AP moms that have made me roll my eyes HARD before and I feel like this picture (camo and all) just catered to that stereotype. If the author's intention was to help people understand these types of choices, this wasn't the picture to do it. But of course, I know now that it wasn't the author's intention to portray these mothers positively.
After a week of hearing negativity, I now love the picture. It's sort of how I feel about extended breastfeeding in general after hearing comments from the peanut gallery - the more you try to make me feel like a pervert for feeding my child naturally, the more I want to whip my boob out in public just to upset you. In this respect, the picture is perfect. The mom is beautiful and fierce, and you know what? She doesn't give a darn what you think about it. Take that, America!
I nursed David until 18 months and would have gone longer if my milk hadn't dried up with the pregnancy. Grace is still nursing at 14.5 months and my plan is to let her self wean. If she wants to nurse until she's four and I still have milk then, she can have it. That's why God gave me boobs and there is nothing wrong with using them in a way that gives my child comfort. I could rattle off a bunch of Scripture to support this notion right now, but I'll spare you. Just remember that Hannah nursed Samuel well into toddlerhood (most people think around age four). I have a feeling Jesus was nursing as a toddler too. Hmmmmmmm.
This all got me thinking about why America is so messed up. People blame our Puritanical background for our messed up relationship with breasts. I don't think that's all of it. I bet the Puritans were nursing their toddlers. In fact, you find a lot of orthodox religious communities (not just Christians) that support nursing. Of course you find some that don't, but that's the case in any culture. I mean, Muslim women who aren't even allowed to expose their face are allowed to nurse their children in public. A culture that goes to the extreme to deny female sexuality recognizes that the act of nursing is non-sexual, yet a culture like ours that goes to every extreme to expose female sexuality can't tell the difference. My head wants to explode.
No, America's twisted ideas about nursing have nothing to do with religion. I believe it has everything to do with the way we view children. We live in a culture that expects children to grow up WAY too soon. We're pressured into teaching our kids to read before they can walk well. Just browse the local Babies-R-Us and look at the amount of junk being marketed to us as necessary for proper brain development. Everything is about education and preparing them to learn the facts necessary to become smart, successful adults. Doctors even suggest to mothers that they put their child in daycare so that they learn how to stand on their own and become properly socialized as preschoolers (because obviously a mother can't teach their child that on her own). True story - I know someone whose doctor said that.
Childhood in its natural sense is gone.
Sure, our culture supports providing our children with all of the toys, tools, and time necessary to have a great childhood, but none of that really has anything to do with being a kid. The expectation is that our kids should act like mini-adults and be socialized into adult society as early as possible. You need to learn to stand in line at age two, Jimmy, or else you'll never learn to do it on your own naturally. Sit in that chair for five hours a day learning, Sally, or you won't be prepared for gainful employment one day. Naps are for the weak, Buddy, it's time to start being a big boy. And get rid of that blankie that gives you comfort or the kids will make fun of you at recess. No more hugging or kissing Mommy on the lips, even if you want to, because that would be pervy. It's time to start acting like adults, children.
When you have a culture that expects children to stand on their own at a young age, of course it seems disgusting and pornographic for them to be suckling their mother's breast at age three. Three-year-olds aren't babies, after all. They aren't SUPPOSED to be at home with their mothers learning about life through natural nurturing and family experiences. They are SUPPOSED to be with their peers, learning structured play and socialization. And since they are mini-adults, they obviously know that boobs are for sex and not food. It's going to scar them for life if they nurse that long.
The most ironic thing about all of this (it would be really funny if it weren't so sad) is that our culture wants our children to grow up so fast in almost every way imaginable, except for when it comes to responsibility. We've created this new stage of life called "adolescence" that never existed prior to the mid-20th century and that basically gives our "young adults" all of the freedom of adulthood without any of the responsibility. Let's face it, our children in America are still children well into their twenties in many cases. They're just trained to think that they aren't.
All of this is so opposite of the way life used to be or the way it naturally evolves in most of other cultures around the world (or even the way our bodies are naturally designed). In most cultures children are viewed as children much longer. A three year old nursing is no big deal because a three year old is still a child. And then around puberty, when the body is mature, the child is expected to "put away childish things" and become an adult. You see these rites of passage into man or womanhood around age 13-14 in most cultures around the world. You're no longer a child, so you start acting like it.
In these cultures that grant adulthood during puberty, it seems like they actually hand over much earlier the one key to adulthood that we withhold. Their kids have the responsibility of an adult BEFORE puberty, often having to care for smaller siblings, help work to support the family, or cook meals. It's the complete opposite of what we do.
So I guess my point to all of this is that I feel we're approaching this wrong. The reason why people think breastfeeding a toddler is gross isn't just because of our relationship with breasts as purely sex objects. I think it has just as much to do with the idea that the natural evolution of childhood isn't being allowed to play out. We're disrupting the flow. Lactivists' efforts to change the way we view breasts are going to be in vain so long as we keep the same approach to childhood.
I co-sleep with my babies. Actually, I bed-share. Grace still wakes up next to me every morning. I like to "wear" my babies in carriers and wraps. I'll even throw my three or four year old in the Ergo when they are sick and want some snuggles. I breastfeed my toddlers. If they needed/wanted to and knew how to do it, I would breastfeed my older boys too. I make a lot of choices that these AP moms make (selective vaccination, avoiding crying it out, nursing on demand, using the nipple as a pacifier, delaying solid foods, etc.). I don't do them because some study shows me that it will help my child's brain development and make them smarter, and I don't do it because some psychologist tells me it will keep them from being an axe murderer when they are older. I do it because it feels right to me. It's what my mothering instincts tell me to do.
I'll do what works for me and you do what works for you.
And as you can see, most other cultures aren't sexualizing the act. So you tell me - who's the REAL pervert?
I finally got around to reading the TIME attachment parenting (AP) article today. I knew better, but did it anyways. I've been hearing nothing but negativity about the cover and parenting philosophy for over a week now, so I should have known that the article would portray these mothers negatively.
At first glance I disliked the picture. Not because I thought it was "pornographic" or "disgusting", as I've heard it described to me, but I thought it was the wrong choice for an article about this type of parenting philosophy (one that is about nurture and comfort). I've met some very militant AP moms that have made me roll my eyes HARD before and I feel like this picture (camo and all) just catered to that stereotype. If the author's intention was to help people understand these types of choices, this wasn't the picture to do it. But of course, I know now that it wasn't the author's intention to portray these mothers positively.
After a week of hearing negativity, I now love the picture. It's sort of how I feel about extended breastfeeding in general after hearing comments from the peanut gallery - the more you try to make me feel like a pervert for feeding my child naturally, the more I want to whip my boob out in public just to upset you. In this respect, the picture is perfect. The mom is beautiful and fierce, and you know what? She doesn't give a darn what you think about it. Take that, America!
I nursed David until 18 months and would have gone longer if my milk hadn't dried up with the pregnancy. Grace is still nursing at 14.5 months and my plan is to let her self wean. If she wants to nurse until she's four and I still have milk then, she can have it. That's why God gave me boobs and there is nothing wrong with using them in a way that gives my child comfort. I could rattle off a bunch of Scripture to support this notion right now, but I'll spare you. Just remember that Hannah nursed Samuel well into toddlerhood (most people think around age four). I have a feeling Jesus was nursing as a toddler too. Hmmmmmmm.
This all got me thinking about why America is so messed up. People blame our Puritanical background for our messed up relationship with breasts. I don't think that's all of it. I bet the Puritans were nursing their toddlers. In fact, you find a lot of orthodox religious communities (not just Christians) that support nursing. Of course you find some that don't, but that's the case in any culture. I mean, Muslim women who aren't even allowed to expose their face are allowed to nurse their children in public. A culture that goes to the extreme to deny female sexuality recognizes that the act of nursing is non-sexual, yet a culture like ours that goes to every extreme to expose female sexuality can't tell the difference. My head wants to explode.
No, America's twisted ideas about nursing have nothing to do with religion. I believe it has everything to do with the way we view children. We live in a culture that expects children to grow up WAY too soon. We're pressured into teaching our kids to read before they can walk well. Just browse the local Babies-R-Us and look at the amount of junk being marketed to us as necessary for proper brain development. Everything is about education and preparing them to learn the facts necessary to become smart, successful adults. Doctors even suggest to mothers that they put their child in daycare so that they learn how to stand on their own and become properly socialized as preschoolers (because obviously a mother can't teach their child that on her own). True story - I know someone whose doctor said that.
Childhood in its natural sense is gone.
Sure, our culture supports providing our children with all of the toys, tools, and time necessary to have a great childhood, but none of that really has anything to do with being a kid. The expectation is that our kids should act like mini-adults and be socialized into adult society as early as possible. You need to learn to stand in line at age two, Jimmy, or else you'll never learn to do it on your own naturally. Sit in that chair for five hours a day learning, Sally, or you won't be prepared for gainful employment one day. Naps are for the weak, Buddy, it's time to start being a big boy. And get rid of that blankie that gives you comfort or the kids will make fun of you at recess. No more hugging or kissing Mommy on the lips, even if you want to, because that would be pervy. It's time to start acting like adults, children.
When you have a culture that expects children to stand on their own at a young age, of course it seems disgusting and pornographic for them to be suckling their mother's breast at age three. Three-year-olds aren't babies, after all. They aren't SUPPOSED to be at home with their mothers learning about life through natural nurturing and family experiences. They are SUPPOSED to be with their peers, learning structured play and socialization. And since they are mini-adults, they obviously know that boobs are for sex and not food. It's going to scar them for life if they nurse that long.
The most ironic thing about all of this (it would be really funny if it weren't so sad) is that our culture wants our children to grow up so fast in almost every way imaginable, except for when it comes to responsibility. We've created this new stage of life called "adolescence" that never existed prior to the mid-20th century and that basically gives our "young adults" all of the freedom of adulthood without any of the responsibility. Let's face it, our children in America are still children well into their twenties in many cases. They're just trained to think that they aren't.
All of this is so opposite of the way life used to be or the way it naturally evolves in most of other cultures around the world (or even the way our bodies are naturally designed). In most cultures children are viewed as children much longer. A three year old nursing is no big deal because a three year old is still a child. And then around puberty, when the body is mature, the child is expected to "put away childish things" and become an adult. You see these rites of passage into man or womanhood around age 13-14 in most cultures around the world. You're no longer a child, so you start acting like it.
In these cultures that grant adulthood during puberty, it seems like they actually hand over much earlier the one key to adulthood that we withhold. Their kids have the responsibility of an adult BEFORE puberty, often having to care for smaller siblings, help work to support the family, or cook meals. It's the complete opposite of what we do.
So I guess my point to all of this is that I feel we're approaching this wrong. The reason why people think breastfeeding a toddler is gross isn't just because of our relationship with breasts as purely sex objects. I think it has just as much to do with the idea that the natural evolution of childhood isn't being allowed to play out. We're disrupting the flow. Lactivists' efforts to change the way we view breasts are going to be in vain so long as we keep the same approach to childhood.
I co-sleep with my babies. Actually, I bed-share. Grace still wakes up next to me every morning. I like to "wear" my babies in carriers and wraps. I'll even throw my three or four year old in the Ergo when they are sick and want some snuggles. I breastfeed my toddlers. If they needed/wanted to and knew how to do it, I would breastfeed my older boys too. I make a lot of choices that these AP moms make (selective vaccination, avoiding crying it out, nursing on demand, using the nipple as a pacifier, delaying solid foods, etc.). I don't do them because some study shows me that it will help my child's brain development and make them smarter, and I don't do it because some psychologist tells me it will keep them from being an axe murderer when they are older. I do it because it feels right to me. It's what my mothering instincts tell me to do.
I'll do what works for me and you do what works for you.
And as you can see, most other cultures aren't sexualizing the act. So you tell me - who's the REAL pervert?
-Jessica
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




